Buddhism and Romance

topic posted Mon, June 23, 2008 - 11:23 AM by  Michael
So I am recently finding myself in a romantic relationship with a girl, one with whom I have been friends for quite a long time.

My question is if possible how does one (anyone including you) engage in fruitful spiritual practice as well as a relationship with another. For me I am realizing that I need a lot of my own space, this is the space where I get everything done including my spiritual practices. I am realizing that I protect and need this space and how much of my time is spent in this space where I dont let anyone interfere. Having this relationship i s throwing a kink in my flow. I recognize it is an opportunity to grow and become more open but it is most difficult and is causing me a lot of tension. Its to the point where I cannot and do not know how to proceed with my own doings while she is around, and in turn it causes me a lot of resentment towards her.

I'm not an ascetic and I do welcome the relationship, any thoughts/suggestions?
posted by:
Michael
California
  • ->
    ->
    offline 65

    Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Mon, June 23, 2008 - 1:14 PM
    Hello Michael. I guess I would ask or wonder how much you cling to a need for the same schedule versus the need for a companion and why.
  • Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Mon, June 23, 2008 - 3:08 PM
    Hi Michael!

    You have found yourself in a not uncommon predicament. Many yogic systems strongly advise against intimate relationships with the opposite (or same) sex because they are a tremendous trap and, as you are experiencing, they can make spiritual practice and development much more difficult. However, where as most yogic systems exclude certain practices and behaviors, Tantric Buddhism does not. You may want to read a recent post I wrote on Tantra, but I can repeat some of it here.

    First of all, a lot of people talk about Tantra, and it is often misunderstood and misrepresented in the west. Tantra is not sexual yoga. It has nothing to do with sex at all actually, or rather, it does not have anything in particular to do with sex over anything else. Tantra is about using the energy and power of conditions that appear to be tremendous adversities as opportunities for expanding and refining your awareness. Tantra is not for a lazy practitioner, and not for a weak practitioner, it is for the very strong yogi who has reached a point in their spiritual practice where the rules of classical yoga systems no longer apply. Similar to a classically trained musician, after a number of years of training in the basic techniques, the scales, reading music, and so forth, they reach a point where those rules are no longer absolutes, where they can improvise and elaborate. Such a person would never say all those basics, the scales and reading music and the subtelety or movements required and trained in for so long is obsolete or unimportant. Indeed, it is important to learn and master the basics before one engages in a Tantric practice.

    So again, you are right in seeing this as a risk to spiritual practice. It is, and a Tantric Buddhist would never say it's not. For my students I recommend against relationships, especially during a certain period within their practice. However, relationships are Nirvana just as everything else is. This is the kind of awareness a Tantric Buddhist cultivates, to see the absolute in the relative. To be able to navigate even the most difficult waters with grace, humility, selflessness, and determination. To use even a relationship as a vehicle to gain a greater insight into the depth and beauty of life. So whatever your current spirtitual practice is, whatever you do, you don't just throw all that out the window, rather figure out a way to apply those understandings and practices within your relationship, just as a yogi strives to do within all aspects of their life. If your partner is supportive and understanding of your practice, you may find that it can give tremendous power to your spiritual development because you are practicing in tumultuous conditions. In other words, you're no longer just rehearsing. "This is not a drill."

    In my personal experience, I have found that the times I have been romantically involved with someone, that my partner felt tremendously threatened by my spiritual practice. This is a common, though unfortunate reaction, and it did result in the eventual termination of the relationship because my priorities were my practice and spiritual development. However, I view those times as tremendously educational and valuable experiences which really, though both blissful and agonizing, have been instrumental on my own path. So the trick is not to become so attached, so mired in the relationship that you abandon your spiritual practice.

    Besides that, just try to keep to bright, happy and fun! You must know when to have boundaries and when to be flexible. If you find yourself dragged into arguments, fighting, etc. In other words, if you find yourself losing energy, that your relationship is draining, then I would say it is having too adverse of an effect on your practice. However, if you can keep it bright, happy, positive, and mutually supportive and empowering, then you are engaging in the relationship correctly.

    Good luck in your travels!

    Ajna
  • Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Mon, June 23, 2008 - 3:14 PM
    After a period of time when things settle down a bit after initializing a relationship, you come to your senses, and it's quite common to begin to ask yourself what the hell is going on. It may be that another person needs more from you than you're willing to give or vice versa - and that's fine because there's are lots of fish in the sea. I think Paula was on track. You just have to make the determination whether it's possible to balance what you feel are your needs with hers, and the extent to which you're willing to schedule your time and output the required level of emotional energy to make it work. And then after you figure that out you'll find that everything has changed, so you'll have to start all over again. Good luck.
  • Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Mon, June 23, 2008 - 9:04 PM
    mi: how does one (anyone including you) engage in fruitful spiritual practice as well as a relationship with another.

    Fruitful spiritual practice *is* a relationship with another. Sometime that other is yourself. Sometimes you are skillful enough to widen your circle.

    mi: I need a lot of my own space

    You have a unique opportunity to learn what you actually need vs what you just desire. Personally I would let her know that there was some stuff I was used to doing alone and I'm not sure what I actually need to do alone vs what I just happened to do alone and I'd like her to help me find out.

    Keep things fluid. Remember some tension is good for you.

    Let her know you are testing your boundaries and its a bit uncomfortable and then reassure her that she is worth it. The key is good dialog *with her* and paying attention to her instead of just yourself.

    My only rule for a good relationship - always choose to be as kind as you can to her.
  • Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Mon, June 23, 2008 - 9:07 PM
    hey what's up michael. I just recently started on the path towards enlightenment and my marriage is suffering for it. I'm not sure its really possible to have it all. I've been married 23 years(since i was 18) so my advice may be jaded but i suggest a fruitful spiritual practice and plenty of booty calls are the way to go:) just kidding good luck it's not easy- Question does she share your spiritual beliefs? if so, can't you guys do this together? It might be time to change the way you do things
    • Re: Buddhism and Romance

      Mon, June 23, 2008 - 9:23 PM
      The path to enlightenment is not one of burned bridges.

      Like all things relationships begin and end, but even with endings the path to enlightenment strengthens harmony, compassion and equanimity.

      If your path is *causing* your marriage to suffer, there is something no yet connecting.
  • Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Tue, June 24, 2008 - 6:45 AM
    Samsara can be like this sometimes.

    I 'met' my partner here on tribe, she was advertising a comfy chair for free, and having just painted a wall red, I thought it might be a nice compliment to have a green chair.Then I saw her picture and thought; "oh, she's cute" and looking at her profile, I noticed that she had Kadam Buddhism listed as an interest and thought; "what are the chances we go to the same temple?" You can probably guess the rest, she did, and we do, and we did and said; "I do." So, now that is one of our commitments, right in there with refuge, bodhisattva, pratimoksha, and tantric vows. In my case it has been wonderful to have a partner that shares my beliefs and understands that it is practice. We support each other fully in attaining spiritual realizations, as well as in the daily yoga of life, it is nice to know someone has your back. It is also important to recognize that relating to others can be a commitment, or something that we have more flexibility around, but ultimately they are impermanent phenomena, so try to enjoy them while they exist and learn what you can about affectionate love, and giving, and the true nature of samsara. Commit yourself to that.

    That said, I too was (am) one who enjoys time to myself to read and write, play music, or engage in sometimes meaningless activity. For a long time I thought it was her, or the relationship, that was causing discomfort but I have come to see that even when we disagree, it provides an opportunity to give the gift of listening, and to understand more clearly my actions and their effects. This is the reason that we engage relationships in the first place - though it does feel nice too - so that we may have a reflection of ourselves, sometimes clear, sometimes distorted, always accurate as to how things are if we stop to look.

    I am reminded of a story the guru tells about the nature of the world. It is like the earth and there are stones that can hurt our feet. We can spend all our time trying to cover the earth with leather, or we can put leather on our feet, the choice is ours to make. Relationships - and their relation to our practice - are like this too.
    • Re: Buddhism and Romance

      Tue, June 24, 2008 - 1:12 PM
      the general psych books on relationships can be good for all kinds of relationship issues. And some get into the differences in belief systems, etc.

      I think it just comes down to a time management issue. You could, for example, get up an hour earlier than her and do some practice then.
      You could plan to make time for practice when she has to work late, go out of town, etc. etc. etc.

      And if you still feel you don't have enough time for practice, as the relationship develops and the respect grows...I think you could easily ask for say, 30 minutes to practice some meditation.

      My gal is spiritual, but does far less practice than me. If I say to her, "I really think I need to take an hour and meditate some" - she is totally cool with it. I would not have asked her that in the first year we were dating....but now, it is just implicit, that whatever time and space I need is cool and whatever time and space she needs is cool.

      I would not overly worry about it. If the love is there, respect will be there too and she will give you the time you need to practice.


  • Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Tue, July 1, 2008 - 2:38 AM

    Hi Bro, don't know what you're level (of practice and development) is, but I can share my Teachers' teachings.

    This comes from His Holiness Buddha Maitreya. I don't think it gets much better than that...although this advice
    may not be for you. To me, I have to say that it does feel right/true...

    I'm told He said in a Dharshan (live teaching and transmission) that He recommends not having intimate relations
    until the 3rd initiation. That would be the level of the realized Rinpoches, I think. Very few of us are there, I believe.
    I'm certainly not. He has also said, "Sex activates processes that we're not ready to deal with at our present level of integration."
    Personally, I think that is easy to see all around us....people get married, 'fall in love', and divorce a few years later.
    Much suffering happens in intimate relationships...
    Also, "...personal relationships don't allow you to be who you are." For me this one really resonates.
    We begin to play smaller than we are.

    This resonates with me, even tho it is hard to tread at times. I think anyone who really has blossomed somewhat the inner
    flower of love/light will know when a thing feels right and when it doesn't. I think we want to be aligned with people who are
    living most soul-fully (people who are quiet and reverent) and not drawn so much into relationship with people who are
    more involved with the world in a 'personality' way...if that makes any sense....

    Ya know its funny, most of us westerners I'd say usually think of monks and nuns as deprived. They live in quiet, remote places and there's no burger joints in sight. But, *really*, I think they might have it GREAT...because...their are so few distractions, that they go deep...and are successful in stabilizing inner clarity, joy and insight, to go even deeper still...Because we all know that their is peace and joy and bliss within that the world can't touch...if we can uncover it.
    Donovan
    • Re: Buddhism and Romance

      Tue, July 1, 2008 - 2:46 AM

      Oh, hey, I might just have an intimate relationship, btw.

      And I *know* it will be painful at times.

      And my priority will be my spiritual practice, by far.

      And if one has to go, it would be the partner, for sure.
      The world needs Love more than it needs a lover.
      much love
      D
      • Re: Buddhism and Romance

        Tue, July 1, 2008 - 9:34 AM
        how can the world have love with out a lover?

        thanks for the good advice everyone.

        Swarm what you said especially resonated...

        I am not a monk or a priest nor am I at this moment in time devoting my life in any such way.

        so i tend to believe that not having relationships (on whatever level) in the name of spiritual practice is a bit ascetic.

        Growth and knowledge of the self comes from the way in which we relate to the experience, and not through trying to create the experience entirely.

        I'm beginning to see the reason it is hard is because she is the biggest mirror that has ever been set before me. I also know that she loves me very very much, and that I will never find another person who loves me as much as she. So i tend to have faith in it.

        My practice tends to lean more towards creating harmony in all parts of my life, and for me it doesnt mean getting rid of what I perceive as not harmonious, but deeply and honestly looking at what causes discord and working on understanding how I relate to it.

        Thanks for the advice, all have been helpful
  • Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Wed, July 2, 2008 - 7:09 AM
    Michael,

    "My question is if possible how does one (anyone including you) engage in fruitful spiritual practice as well as a relationship with another."

    By redefining spiritual practice....a relationship too is spiritual practice. It has been said married life is excellent sadhana. I also heard it said, if you think you are enlightened...test it out and go live with your parents for a couple weeks. Fruitful spiritual practice will come from the relationship.

    Of course, you will need some space. My fiance leaves me alone when I say I am going to meditate in the other room. But I (and likely you) did not have as much space as when I was alone...so I found new avenues of spiritual practice (in and through the relationship itself).

    Look at this as a Tantric (no, I am not taking about sex)...in tantra, everything in life is used as spiritual practice (sadhana). If you are in a relationship...there is spiritual practice there too...use the relationship for spiritual practice.

    There is no need to separate...this is my spiritual life (practice) and this is my relationship...there are not two things here.

    Namaste,

    ~ Eric Putkonen
    www.awaken2life.org
    • Re: Buddhism and Romance

      Wed, July 2, 2008 - 2:34 PM
      well...

      I can't get paid or laid...

      so can you like leave us losers something...

      so come on - like how come mr. buddha left the pleasure palace...?
      • Re: Buddhism and Romance

        Thu, July 3, 2008 - 6:55 AM
        "so come on - like how come mr. buddha left the pleasure palace...? "

        The "pleasure palace" was something imposed on Siddhartha with the conscious intention of restricting his ability to choose for himself what kind of life he wished to lead. He had to leave in order to live his own life on his own terms.
  • Re: Buddhism and Romance

    Thu, July 3, 2008 - 7:25 PM
    This is what really strikes me about spirituality in general. Spiritual people ALWAYS know what to do after a breakup. However, a RELATIONSHIP is seen as a threat to spiritual practice, or at least a challenge or predicament. Okay, a new relationship should be fun and enjoyable. Honestly, if you're thinking about glum scriptures and crap while you're holding your sweetheart's hand, something is wrong with your practice. Also, if you'd rather sit on a cushion than hold her in your arms, something just may be wrong with you.

    Seriously, though, wanna know how to squeeze some meditation time into your new schedule~? When she's shopping for shoes and leaving you stranded in the mall, rather than waiting for her in the sports bar, you should sit on a bench, fold your hands into a mudra and do some meditation there. Meditation is something that can be done anywhere and anytime; it isn't just something you need to do on a cushion in front of an altar. The world is your temple, playground or prison -- whichever you make of it.
    • Re: Buddhism and Romance

      Sun, July 6, 2008 - 8:17 PM
      Does she really spend a lot of time shopping for shoes??

      <sheesh> stereotypes for women die hard...

      She might be busy reading Crime and Punishment for example and you could then go a-meditating...and she'd be well...relieved to have some peace and quiet to conduct her kind of "spiritual practice". Thanks fully we're all different contrary to what the TV wants us to believe.

      (I'm not being glib...just adding my two cents... as I enjoy solitude even when in a great relationship.)
      • Re: Buddhism and Romance

        Sun, July 6, 2008 - 8:44 PM
        this is a terrific thread!!! Thanks for all the posts.
        relationships , spiritual practice, and solitude . . .the integration is surely magnificent once achieved.
        It is that integration thats the kicker . . .
        • Re: Buddhism and Romance

          Mon, July 7, 2008 - 2:35 PM
          There is no Separation.
          • Re: Buddhism and Romance

            Mon, July 7, 2008 - 2:37 PM
            life is practice.

            relationships are practice.

            if your relationship is not supporting you to be and become what you need to be and become (whether that's enlightened or something else) then maybe consider another arrangement.

            but there doesn't have to be a conflict.
      • Re: Buddhism and Romance

        Mon, July 7, 2008 - 7:34 PM
        I brought up that stereotype because I was rather annoyed. The whole topic seemed to forget that women have social lives and need time alone. The whole thing about relationships as spiritual practice, relationships being an obstacle to spiritual practice and all that REALLY sounded kinda egocentric to me. Therefore, I used the old, worn out stereotypes to remind the guys that they aren't the only ones who need space. That cheesy 1950s image has thus far served its purpose.
        • ->
          ->
          offline 65

          Ego, self, selflessness and the other...

          Mon, July 7, 2008 - 7:49 PM
          I think that this is a subject worthy of attention in a lot of directions. I think that all 'me time' inherently comes from a place of ego. That's what ego is all about. As much as ego has evolved into a negative, we all need some semblence of ego, as well as super-ego, otherwise Id just takes over.

          As well I ponder the aspect of the hyper-internalism that seems rampant in so-called "Western" Buddhism. Those people who I know who have grown up in an asian country and a Buddhist envionment spend -=much=- more of their time working together as a commuunity of Buddhists than those who have been raised in a non-buddhist-dominant environment. I wonder if on some level, the christian obsession with being in everyone's 'moral' business causes those who reject it and embrace another religion to be very private and internal about their religion or spiritual practice,
          • Relationships

            Tue, July 8, 2008 - 2:45 AM
            Many of Christ's disciples, including St. Peter, were married. A number of Sri Ramakrishna's disciples, including very advanced ones, were married. Sri Yukteswar, the Guru of Paramahansa Yogananda, was married for awhile, as was his Guru, Lahiri Mahasaya.

            I don't know the Buddhist history about this very well, but I would assume it is similar...that a certain percentage of great Buddhist aspirants, were also married.

            The purpose is spirituality. If celibacy serves that, then fine. But there is more to the path than mere purity.
            • Re: Relationships

              Tue, July 8, 2008 - 5:37 AM
              The Buddha was married.

              Celibacy is not purity. Its just not having sex.
              • Re: Relationships

                Tue, July 8, 2008 - 9:10 AM
                to choose for himself what kind of life he wished to lead. He had to leave in order to live his own life on his own terms.


                Yep, as we each get to choose.... Yeahhhhhhhhhh for great Sex!
                • Re: Relationships

                  Tue, July 8, 2008 - 4:58 PM
                  It is true that he failed his family. But its a good reminder that he was only human.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Relationships

                    Tue, July 8, 2008 - 5:06 PM
                    The Buddha failed his family by abandoning them in a pleasure palace. Yeah, they were REALLY aching for child support. If the Buddha stayed, Rahula would have been stuck with a jerk for a father. At least the grandpa was much, much nicer to Rahula than the Buddha would have been. Siddh was a real prick before he spent all that time under the Bodhi tree.
                    • Re: Relationships

                      Wed, July 9, 2008 - 2:52 PM
                      It's usually not appreciated how important it was for the Buddha to first have a son before he left the palace. Because he left behind a male heir Yasodhara's status actually increased with the departure of her husband - she was now the mother of the "heir-apparent". I'm sure that Yasodhara missed her honey-bunchkin very much - but that kind of stuff happens, and if it's going to happen, well, it helps being a princess in a palace while your trying to get over the pain. Or so I would imagine.

                      Both Yasodhara and Pajapati Gotami became great Buddhist teachers in their own right - in fact just about everyone in the Buddha's family besides old Suddhodana did.
                    • Re: Relationships

                      Wed, July 9, 2008 - 5:18 PM
                      The "pleasure palace" is a bit of a later embellishment, the archeology puts them at about the same state as the ancient Gaelic peoples. "Prince, princess and king" would be more accurately Chieftain's son, wife and chief. It would also be a mistake applying later traditions on them.

                      Without more information about their actual culture its hard to say what her status was, though the stories seem to indicate she got by ok. At least she seems to have been treated better than abandoned Saudi women who loose everything and must beg or modern India rural women who are often killed by their mother-in-laws..